Interviews

Machine Power- The Silver Man

Machine Power, Number Two. Winter 1992.
Interview with Silverman (Phillip Knight) by David Faris

Keyboardist and programmer Phil Knight, better known as “the Silver Man”, has been collaborating with Edward Ka-spel and an evolving lineup of musicians for over a decade, producing progressive/expressive music under the group name The Legendary Pink Dots. A wide range of musical styles have been explored and integrated into the Dots’ distinctive sound, a dark modern psychadelia where innovative electronics meet Ka-Spel’s brooding lyrics, where bursts of noise collide with pop melodies and tribal rhythms, where the unexpected is in turn shocking and pleasantly surprising. The Legendary Pink Dots embarked on their second North American tour as a group in July of 1991. David S. Faris spoke with Phil Knight by phone prior to the Dots’ spectacular Toronto show about Pink Dots, crop circles, and the apocalypse….

DSF: Edward Ka-Spel’s solo tour with Skinny Puppy back in 1987 was the first exposure that North Americans got to the Legendary Pink Dots live. Why did Edward perform solo, rather than having the Pink Dots come over?

PK: That was due to the connection with Cevin Key from Skinny Puppy, really. Cevin was a great fan of what we did, and he made it possible to get Edward over for a few shows, and also to work with Skinny Puppy. That in turn helped introduce audiences in North America to the music of Legendary Pink Dots, and made it possible for the Pink Dots to tour as a unit in 1989.

DSF: The LPDs are often associated with the “industrial music” category, maybe because of your work with Skinny Puppy, and the fact that you operated in that field. Do you think that’s very accurate?

PS: There are of course elements of industrial music in what we do, because we work quite heavily with electronic, but I think it’s actually rather difficult to put the Pink Dots into any one box. People find it very difficult to describe our music, you know… we tend to bleed over between a number of boxes, whether it’s industrial, psychadelic, avante-garde, pop music, whatever. There are elements of all that in what we do, and I think that’s healthy. In a way, it’s the trend for the nineties, which is more of a synthesis, you know; the nineties are very much a sign of people synthesizing all the different types of music together.

DSF: “The Maria Dimension” seems to have Eastern Influences incorporated with the earlier electronic sound, and you’re using more traditional acoustic instruments.

PK: Yah. Well, we recorded “The Maria Dimension” in a very different way. Quite often, Edward and I do a lot of pre-composition work before we record albums, but in the earlier days of the Pink Dots, we used to leave much more to chance, and sort of really get into band compositions that were spontaneous in the studio, but there’ve been so many lineup changes in the Pink Dots over the years that Edward and I had to, in a sense, fall back into more sort of pre-compositional work. With “The Maria Dimension”, however, we purposely didn’t do the pre-composition work. We just wanted to do it spontaneously, and get the other members really working on the compositions with us as we recorded them. It provided for a wonderful atmosphere, and we had a great time, and we really think that the music came out great because of that.

DSF: One of the most powerful tracks on the album is “The Grain Kings”. It mentions on the sleeve that the lyrics are influenced by author Keith Roberts. Are they very directly related, or are they more spontaneously composed as well?

Pk: It wasn’t such a literal influence. I think just in general Edward enjoys the work of Keith Roberts, and… I mean “The Grain Kings” has a lot to do with a phenomenon that’s happening all over the world at the moment, and it’s happening particularly in England, where these strange circles have been appearing in the corn fields, and nobody knows how they’re created. It seems to be some sort of energy vortex or link from another dimension that’s creating these circles that in the last year have been getting more and more complicated, turning into very complicated piktograms, and it’s obviously an intelligence working behind these pictograms. I think that it’s one of the most interesting phenomenon that’s happening right at this moment in the world, and it’s something that, you know, you can’t say it’s a hoax, and you can’t say it’s UFO’s landing, or something like that. It’s really some sort of intelligence trying to come through, and I think it’s trying to shake us up, the human race, and to say, “Look, you know, there are things greater than you”, and I think it’s very relevant to the times, very important.

DSF: The lyrics of the Pink Dots are usually very tragic, dealing with themes of desperation and the apocalypse. There are also references to altered states of perception and dream-like experiences.

PK: It’s all a sign of the times, it’s not… ok, a lot of people say it’s the new age, and you can put whatever label on that you want, but the fact is is that there is some expanding consciousness going on, and either you’re going to go with it, or you’re not, you know. The term apocalypse, I think people always look at that in a very black sense, and think of maybe nuclear holocaust scenes and things like that, but you know, it’s not necessarily so. I think there’s movements happening all over the world, the old ways are breaking down, like in Europe, the East European countries are now really shifting, and things are shifting and coming back together in different ways. We’re a bunch of people that like to read the signs of the times, and I think that for a lot of people who also are going through similar things, and changing their lives, the Pink Dots provides a connection and a comfort for them, that there’s other people out there who are also taking an interest and are aware of the same sort of things going on. Maybe the leaders of the world aren’t aware of it at the moment, but they’re gonna be very soon.

DSF: Do you find that you make much more contact with people through your music, and make much change at all, or do you think it’s missing the mark, if that’s what you’re trying to do?

PK: Well, we get alot of mail, and I think people do sort of understand us, you know. Of course, there are people who misunderstand us. I mean there’s always people that are going to want to put you up on a pedestal and make you into some big cult thing, you know, like the Temple of Psychick Youth or something, and I think those people miss the point. We don’t want to be put up there. We may use names like “The Prophet Qa’sepel”, and stuff like that, but I mean that’s our sense of humour, and I think there are people that misinterpret us who don’t realize that we have a sense of humour.

DSF: What’s the origin of the Silver Man persona? Is it from your stage makeup?

PK: Yah.. I mean, I’m not going to be going ’round with my stage makeup, wearing a silver face on this tour. Its not something I want to do for the rest of my life. The name “The Silver Man” came from a song on “The Lovers” album, called “Flowers for the Silver Man” and it’s sort of a character that I felt empathy with when we made that song, and that’s how I took on that name, but well, I’m not going to go around wearing a silver face for the rest of my life, you know… I’m me. The stage show can still be very dramatic, and I think there’s always a theatrical element to what we do. Edward is a very charismatic performer, I think, and uh.. you know, he still wears his cracks, and he’s still pretty intense on stage. It’s still a pretty intense stage show.

DSF: I’ve heard that there are plans for another Tear Garden album, as well as a for a collaboration with members of Front Line Assembly.

PK: Yeah, there are in fact. The tour’s arranged in quite a neat way, where we sort of start off in Canada, go into North America, around North America, and then end up in Canada at Vancouver, and Edward and I will be staying in Vancouver, because we’re both going to be working on a new Tear Garden project with Cevin and Dwayne. Edward was also planning a collaboration with Bill Leeb (FLA) but unfortunately in the end there just wasn’t the time, so that’s not going to be happening now.

DSF: There’s also a collaborative project with members of HNAS.

PK: That’s right, the MIMIR project. That’s also a very special project for us. I mean, we’re very close friends too with the HNAS guys, and it was a very interesting project. It’s music that I think people will be quite surprised by. It’s really something that’s totally different from the Pink Dots. It’s totally different from HNAS too, but you know, I would have to warn people that if they’re expecting to hear Edward’s voice, well, they can forget it, because it has no vocals on it. It’s purely instrumental music, and it’s quite intuitive music, and it has quite a dream-like atmosphere to it, but if people are expecting the Pink Dots, you know, don’t, because Mimir is something that’s totally outside of what we do with the Pink Dots, or with Tear Garden.

DSF: Have the Pink Dots released any video work, or documentation of their live shows on video?

PK: We have never done a video yet. We’ve never found, up to now, the right people that we feel have got the imagination to match our work. Sometimes I wonder whether video work might spoil that for people, because at the moment we get people to use their own imaginations, and I think that’s very important. I think, you know, there’s always a chance that we’re going to try some video work in the future, but we’re not in a hurry. If the right people come along and we think it could enhance what we do, then we’ll go for it.

DSF: After over ten years of recording and so many albums and side projects coming out, is there a chance that you’ll slow down in your output, or do you think that you’re going to be continuously inspired to produce more work?

PK: Oh yah, I mean, we never run out of ideas. There’s always fresh ideas coming up, and there’s always so much happening around to fuel new ideas. I think that our music, the music styles that we use in our music, you know, it ensures that we never get stale. We’re never in any one style or form of music, a formula that we get stuck in, because we always like to pull in so many different influences. They’re not conscious influences, I don’t think. I think we just like good music, and we like good sounds, and you know, we’ll use sounds and aspects from anywhere, whether it’s opening a window and sticking a microphone outside to get environmental sounds, or whether it’s using elements of ethnic rhythms and things, or just really going far out into the electronics sphere, or just beautiful simple pop melodies. I mean, it’s so wide for us, and that ensures that we never get stale with what we do.

 

Melody Maker- Edward Ka-Spel 1992

There was a short interview with edward ka-spel in the sidelines section of melody maker (january 18 1992 issue, with primal scream on the cover). here it is, for your reading enjoyment:


 

The point of philosophy, many have said, is that a question is only worth asking if the asnwer generates more questions. It’s the way the Legendary Pink Dots have always worked; forever on the move, a continual process of exploration, where each discovery acts as a new point of departure.

“Tanith and the Lion Tree” takes up the Dots’ lineage (stretching back over 10 years) and takes it further out still, but, this time, seer and lead singer, EDWARD KA-SPEL, has decided on a temporary solo voyage. Like before, its network of moods, processions and hallucinatory tales flourish and surrender to each other, but they’ve never been quite as disperse as this, subsuming into near silence as each element communicates and responds among the most delicate of threads. It’s like playing Chinese Whispers in Little Nemo’s Slumberland.

Ka-Spel has built up his own world through TLPD, so, was “Tanith” a deliberate continuation?

“In a way,” he says, “everything I do seems to have that kind of tendency towards it. Even with the new Dots’ album, that comes out soon, there are scenes that relate to what’s gone on before. It’s like an ever-widening tapestry. You gradually fill in the colours and make it a bit more detailed. It’s never complete, so there’s always a little bit of white that needs to be filled in, and you can fill it with one colour, or you could make it another little universe in itself.”

How real is this world for you?

“It’s real enough, because I’ve been living in it for so many years now you begin to wonder what is real, and what isn’t. Have you ever had an experience where you have this very vivid memory where you’ve done something? Maybe it’s a childhood memory, and you talk to your parents about it and they say, ‘What are you talking about? That never happened.’ It becomes apparent that you’re remembering a dream you had in your childhood.”

Tanith has a similar effect, as if it inhabits a strange borderworld between the concrete and the non-existent, a recollection you can’t quite place.

“That’s the sort of thing I try to put in writing,” Ka-Spel explains. “I’ve had a lot of experiences that way. It’s disorienting, it makes you question your entire history in the cold, hard reality. It feels less important in fact, and the fantasy, to me, shares that reality.”

People only enquire into the world around them to discover what their place in it is, but, since your world is never fully apparent, and all the elements you create can never be traced back to souce, this must be a very inconclusive project.

“I think that’s the story of TLPD. It ever expands, and becomes more colourful. It’s never complete, it never can be complete.”

Impossibility; the language of faith, the purest motivation.

Desi The Three-Armed Wonder Comic jondr@sco.com

 

Dr. Yo- Edward Ka-Spel

source: http://www.dr-yo.com/writing_pink_dots.html

We are The Legendary Pink Dots, and this is a serviette. We are not here to serve you, but to get you. Yes, to get you. To change all your petty, pretty, shitty preconceptions about life.

Do not expect entertainment! We do not jump through hoops for you! You will not be spoon-fed, this is not a circus — just accept that your continued existence depends on your interpretation of this message:

BELIEVE! Because we believe. But we are not telling you what we believe in…

Sing while you may!

— Edward Ka-spel


In a world oversaturated with meaningless information and assembly-line art, The Legendary Pink Dots represent individuality laughing in the face of oppression. They stand in opposition to the vampirism of contemporary pop culture, in which artists and co nsumers alike are drained by media parasites. No other band provides such an effective vaccine for the malignant cultural viruses which plague us all.

Based in Amsterdam, the band is half English, half Dutch. After ten years of relative obscurity, their peculiar form of psyber-shamanism has finally been recognized by the American mainstream. Their latest release, The Maria Dimension, is among t heir finest — and its success may well inject much-needed creativity into the stagnant gene pool of popular music.

The Pink Dots are the inheritors of Syd Barrett’s artistic legacy. From a panchromatic sound palette, they generate iridescent psychedelic visions — like Tibetan thangkas painted on crushed velvet. Each song is a universe in itself, populated with peacef ul or wrathful beings. As the title implies, The Maria Dimension is primarily an invocation of The Goddess in her various avatars.

Effecting the individual on mental, physical, and emotional levels, this music is a holistic experience. The Dots induce trance states, synaesthesia, and emotional resonances without compromising one’s intellect — a remarkable achievement. There is a phi losophical and psycho-spiritual element to the lyrics which shines like gold, even from the pit of insanity and existential despair.

Edward Kaspel, lead singer and lyricist for the Legendary Pink Dots, spoke with Christian Atrocity and myself in Los Angeles. [December 1991.] Competing for Edward’s precious time were various drug casualties, Hollywood scenesters, and clueless artist wannabes. We clocked in just under 30 minutes alone with this enigmatic but amiable man.

— Aaron Ross


Aaron Ross: Could you give a brief history of the Dots and tell us how you evolved into a collective organism?

Edward Kaspel: It’s basically a band of friends. Back in 1980, it was myself, Phil, who plays keyboards, and a girl named April. We lived in the same area and practiced in an old house in East London. Since then, the band has changed lineup maybe 19 time s. It’s never been the most stable of bands, mainly because of the type of music we make — it’s a recipe for poverty.

Christian Atrocity: Are you able to support yourself with your music?

EK: Now we can. As soon as we began selling more than 10,000 records.

CA: Has that effected your music?

EK: Not at all. All we ever do is hand over a finished master tape to the record company. We refuse to give them any demo, we refuse to give them any indication of what we’re busy recording. There’s a certain trust between us and the company.

AR: Have you reached a wider audience over the past few years?

EK: Yes, but we don’t know why! If anything, the music has become less commercial in the last few years. But, at the same time, the audience has grown, especially with the last album — it actually doubled the audience within the first month of its release. I think Caroline Records had a lot to do with it.

AR: Were any of you academically trained in music?

EK: No, we’re completely self-taught.

AR: There’s a very distinctive color to your music . . .

EK: A distinctive multicolor!

AR: It makes me think that timbre is the most important thing. You seem to spend a lot of time developing the sound aspect of your music.

EK: We’re total perfectionists, but it’s so intuitive … you just simply know. Its an emotional thing. None of it is premeditated; a lot of what you hear on The Maria Dimension was recorded live in the studio, excepting the vocals, which are added later. I do believe that music is mainly a thing of emotion, although I think it’s lovely if the head is purring as well.

AR: Do you record at home with a mobile?

EK: Neils, our saxophone player, has his own farm by the river, an hour from the nearest village. He has a barn where we have our own eight-track.

AR: It sounds so finely crafted, I thought you’d hauled in a digital 24-track!

EK: No, it’s a Tascam! An old one.

CA: They’re workhorses.

AR: In writing the lyrics, do you see it as a process of communication with your audience, yourself, or the other band members?

EK: Largely with myself. A lot of the lyrics are extremely introspective, and I write them primarily to please me. If they can twang a chord in somebody, then all the better. They’re open to great misinterpretation, but I can understand that, and I actually don’t mind. I think it’s great if people see something totally different in it than what I see. There’s a track called “A Space Between” on The Maria Dimension. It’s basically about “What do we know?” We know nothing, really! What if events have feelings, too? A girl came up to me in Detroit and, “Yeah, that’s all about abortion, isn’t it?” I thought, “Where’d she get that from?” I looked at the lyrics in a different light, and I could see it!

AR: “We all have names.”

CA: People are just reading in what they want.

EK: That’s all anybody can do, unless you’re sloganeering at people. I don’t like beating people over the head with a club with my opinions — which may well be wrong!

AR: Didn’t you say, “We’re here to get you, to change your preconceptions”?

EK: Oh, you heard that! That was just us winding the audience up. We love to play mind games. There’s a lot of humor in the Pink Dots, always has been. And the funniest part of it all is how seriously people take us. I nearly fall down laughing when peop le come up to me and say, “Oh, it’s the PROPHET!” That’s the whole reason the term, “The Prophet Qaspel” came to being. After I watched myself on a video, stomping about a stage in my long cape, with lines painted all over my face like the Rock of God, I couldn’t stop laughing. I thought, “You pretentious bastard, you look just like one of those old prophets. That’s a great name! I’ll be The Prophet Qaspel on the next album — everybody’s going to laugh.” They didn’t.

AR: I did!

EK: I’m glad. You’re the first.

AR: Is your philosophy of “sing while you may” an optimistic one?

EK: We talked a lot about this thing called the Terminal Kaleidescope. If you look at the history of the planet over the last few hundred years, you become aware of a rapid acceleration of events. It’s rather like the planet was a drowning man watching its life flash before its eyes, as it goes down — maybe for the last time, maybe not. But how can we relate to that? Be glad you live now, you’re witnessing the most significant period in the entire history of the planet. Cherish this time; sing while you may.

AR: The human race is in its adolescence.

CA: Let’s hope it’s not a suicidal teen.

EK: I still don’t actually believe that the human race is capable of destroying this planet or itself.

AR: The planet’s going to fight tooth and nail for its survival.

EK: A lot of The Maria Dimension is about this astonishing arrogance. We can’t even explain how a bumblebee flies yet; that strikes me as being quite primitive, scientifically.

AR: About the song, “Blacklist.” Is that a true story?

EK: It’s just an observation of certain trends. It was inspired by a very simple incident. We’d come back over the German-Holland border, and our sound man, Hans, got hauled over to the customs office by the police. He hadn’t paid a parking fine a few months earlier. I thought, “My God, they can track you even down to an unpaid parking fine!” And he wasn’t allowed to pass back into his own country until he paid it. That’s sinister.

CA: Who are the most pathetic musicians you can think of — your antithesis?

EK: I never usually like slagging off other bands, but I’m pretty offended by Guns ‘n’ Roses, because of what they said about gays and anybody else who simply deviates. I hate fascism of any kind, and I think they’ve been responsible for some pretty bad shit that way. However, having said that, I don’t know their music well. If I consider something bad, I simply choose not to listen to it. I never listen to the radio, for instance; it’s a waste of time.

AR: So you keep yourself isolated and uncontaminated?

EK: Not completely — there are many bands I admire. For example, Nurse With Wound. They’ve been going for even longer than us. I enjoy a band like Coil, because they can always surprise you. And there were so many bands that were great at the start, and somehow they lost something on the way up. Like Chrome — the early Chrome was fantastic; now it’s a little bit mechanical, I think. It can happen to musicians, I don’t know why.

AR: Don’t you think they might burn out?

EK: I’m not so sure about burning out, but sometimes motivations change. Often I’ve seen bands chase the money out of desperation. I wouldn’t lay into them for that. We had members of the Pink Dots before who desperately wanted the band to become big, but there was always a balance of people who desperately wanted to keep it small.

AR: A hypothetical question: what if you do become “big”?

EK: We’d probably make an album with one tone, with backwards guitars all over it. Then we’d really give the audience a hard time.

AR: Didn’t Lou Reed do that?

EK: If we become big, it’ll be totally on our terms, and our terms won’t change. They can’t, not after ten years. And yet the distribution has leapt, and we don’t know why. It’s not as if we’ve made any compromise at all. Whereas it seems that more and more bands are getting into the house sound, we decided a year ago that we’d kick the drum machine out! I’m totally allergic to being hit over the head with things.

AR: So who plays percussion now?

EK: We take turns banging and thrashing anything within reach, but we can only do that in the studio. On tour, the rhythms are stored as loops in the EPS.

CA: So what have you done in America besides the tour?

EK: We’ve just toured. If we have a day off, it’s a luxury. But we finish with a collaborative recording session in Vancouver with Skinny Puppy.


The Dots’ current lineup:

  • The Prophet Qaspel (Edward Kaspel): Left brain, larynx, keyboards
  • The Silverman (Philip Knight): Right brain, keyboards, electro-wizardry
  • Father Pastorius (Bob Pistoor): Guitars of all sorts
  • Niels Van Hoornblower (Niels Van Hoorn): Saxes, clarinets, flutes, analog wind controller (which makes no sense)

 

B-side Magazine- Edward Ka-Spel

B-side magazine, Oct/Nov 91. Article by Bill Lamorey

They played at the New Music Seminar, but the Legendary Pink Dots are by no means newcomers to the music scene. These English gents have been together since the late seventies, making records since the early eighties, and ignored by virtually everyone right into the nineties. Yet, the Dots have persevered and finally seem to be receiving some of the recognition that they’ve deserved from their start.

Troubles and tribulations have greeted the Dots around nearly every corner of their musical journey. Disputes with record labels coupled with financial hardships nearly led to the breakup of the LPDs on more than one occasion. However, iron wills and a blinding passion for creating audio masterpieces have held them together for their latest release, The Maria Dimension, released domestically on Caroline records.

Though the line-up has evolved over the years, the core of the LPDs remains intact with vocalist/lyricist/etc Edward Ka-Spel and main keyboardist/programmer Phil “the Silverman” Harmonix. The nucleus of the Dots is radiantly augmented with further colors by a host of other musicians that varyingly are Pink Dot members and guest musicians. Because of their bizarre noms de plume, it’s difficult to keep up with who is who each year.

Unlike last year, the LPDs were cleared to enter the US for an entirely too brief tour. And to think that this band could be questioned on artist merit merely due to the fact that they aren’t mega-sellers. That’s certainly a valid judging point for allowing bands into the country. After their diminutive fling in the US, the Dots will be doing some dates in Canada before returning home away from the maddening crowd in the Netherlands.

While touring in the States, the “Prophet Qa-Sepel” conducted in in-depth conversation with B-Side.


BS: You’ve just completed your European Tour. How did it go?

EK: It was good generally, especially France. We didn’t have enough shows in France; we only played two. There are really quite huge crowds there. There are quite a few French fanatics and they all think they’re the only LPD fans in France. Then they go to the show and there’s like 700 people there with them. It’s a strange thing, because we don’t get much publicity, we get very little. We don’t covet publicity, we never have. In a way, we’re too busy creating the music.

BS: I understand you played at the New Music Seminar in New York?

EK: Oh yeah, the New Music Seminar, a dreadful affair. It’s like all these guys from record companies walking around looking important, trying to impress bands with how influential they are. I’m rather allergic to that. It’s our New York show, that’s how I look at it and that’s how we got through it. You know, we don’t really want anything to do with the bullshit that surrounds it.

BS: How well in sales is the Maria Dimension doing?

EK: TMD sold 20,000. This is in a way, a kind of breakthrough. They all still go, even Brighter Now (the Dots first LP) is still 1000 a year. We’re like a phenomenon at Play it Again Sam. They don’t understand how a band works like that. The back catalogue keeps turning over as if they were new records.

BS: I believe that’s because it’s timeless music. It’s not dated where it becomes old and stale in a year.

EK: It’s great to hear you say that. I mean, that’s the intention. I hate trends and fashions.

BS: That’s obvious from the music. How does it feel to be a creative artist who’s made many brilliant albums and still remains relatively obscure? Do you get angry when you see pop sensations with minimal talent and zero creativity climbing the record sales charts?

EK: I’ll be very honest about it; once I did. In the early days you think “Why? Is there a lot of money being pumped into these bands?” Usually that is the case. The LPDs, in a way, are quite lucky. We’ve been a totally underground band for years and years and years, and we’ve now had some sort of recognition. I mean the fact that we can come to America denotes some kind of recognition. There are other bands, which I would say, are also wonderful bands, extremely creative, who’re still selling like 700 records. That’s really unfair. Bands like HNAS and Nurse With Wound – I think they’re brilliant. And how many records do they sell?

BS: Right. And then you see the New Kids On The Block and similar dross soaring the record charts.

EK: Yeah, but in ten year’s time they’re gonna be pretty old kids on the block. If you’re in it purely for the money, ultimately what do you get at the end of it? You may as well become a bricklayer and own your own little building company eventually. You’ll make as much money maybe. But where’s the fun in it? Where’s the joy in it? These people deny themselves joy for a few years just to sort of get the big dollar. How do they spend it ultimately? It’s not my way really.

BS: Are your album sales enough to support the band financially now? Didn’t you have day jobs up until a few years ago?

EK: I haven’t had a day job since ’84. In the early days it was very, very hard. I mean it was even difficult to buy food and things like that for a while. We earned about $3000 a year in the beginning. Now it’s well liveable. It’s not fantastic, we’d still get more if we lived off the state in Holland, but in comparison, yah, I do what I enjoy and I’d never
complain. Say there was no band, I would have wanted to see all these places and it would have cost me a fortune.

BS: Conceptually how does TMD tie in with your theory of the Terminal Kaleidoscope?

EK: To be honest, I don’t talk so much about the TK anymore. That’s not to say I don’t believe in it, but in a way, I’ve explained it too many times to a point where I felt like I was repeating a kind of formula. I think in some ways what I’ve said about that is not a new theory at all. I mean, I’ve heard other people that have talked in the same way, but never called it the Terminal Kaleidoscope. Philosophers and the like, and I didn’t know that at the time. But you know, I think it is something that is very obvious now. Which is just the acceleration of things. It seems to be a natural process, this acceleration… and never has it been more obvious than now really. I mean, just the dramatic changes in climate for instance.

In some ways, you can say it’s scary. I don’t think it’s actually scary. I don’t think the human race is capable of destroying this planet, maybe mutating it, but I think the planet is stronger than the human race. There’s a bigger hand that sort of like really pulls the strings.

BS: Is it still a goal of the Dots to transcend reality?

EK: To create our own peculiar reality, I’d say.”

BS: You still use characters and settings from your own “peculiar reality” on your records. Is TMD meant to be another chapter in your created reality?

EK: TMD is full of songs and questions. And they’re questions that I’ve been asking myself for years and trying to express in lyrics form. Like the idea of events having feelings too. I mean the deeper root is basically, how much do we actually understand about the nature of things? And actually, we understand so very very little. Who has successfully explained the flight of the bumblebee yet? You know, this bumblebee flies around and around and he doesn’t have anything to stay in the air. That’s just a small thing, but it goes to show, how much do we really know. And it’s nothing compared to what there is to understand.

So you propose preposterous ideas, and they could be true. You know, events maybe have personalities too. You know, who’s to say they don’t? Who’s to say the world will end in an ecological disaster when it could just as easily turn into a giant cornflake? We don’t really understand the nature of things and the instability, or the apparent instability, of the
patterns of nature. I really think we’re novices in these kinds of questions.

BS: How would you describe the type of music that the LPDs create?

EK: What we’re projecting is ourselves, it’s ourselves in the finest detail. Sort of things that you’d maybe liked to cover up as well; the dark things, the optimistic parts… We want to make people cry, we want to make people laugh; all mixed together, just to get to all those emotions. Get to the parts of people they’d maybe like to cover up within
themselves. I think it’s a very emotional music. That is the criteria when we start creating. We really want to put ourselves so totally into it that it sort of makes us feel personally uncomfortable when we hear it.

BS: So it’s never meant to be background music for casual listenings?

EK: It’s never meant to be background music. You know, if people are sitting, having dinner with the LPDs on, it’s better that they’re silent. You know, we’d really be annoyed if anyone talked all over it. I mean, some people will, I think they should maybe put on something else. All good music demands attention.

BS: TMD seems to contain less of the classical elements that pervaded many of your previous releases.

EK: It always depends on how we feel at the time, when we’re composing. I would never say that the classical element is gone. It’s likely to rear its head strongly again. On TMD and Crushed Velvet Apocalypse, we really
wanted to make sort of total sound pictures. Really sort of like a movie for the ears. We’ll probably continue on this line on the next one too. We’re enjoying this line at the moment, trying to make it even more vivid album by album.

BS: Are you planning a follow up single to TMD?

EK: I think that’s unlikely. Singles were very much a record company idea originally. We never actually played that game. You’re supposed to take the 12″ single from the album to promote the album. We thought that’s ripping people off, they’re buying it twice. It sort of caused dilemmas between us and PIAS. They saw things in a marketing way and we saw things in an artistic sense. Ultimately, we agreed to stop it with the singles.

BS: Well, your singles were never on any of the albums anyway.

EK: See, that was the dilemma. You know, we wanted them to be entities within themselves. We didn’t go out to make a single, we went out to make an EP. There was an EP released with TMD in Europe. A Three inch CD. Very nice we think, but absolutely nothing like a single. Five new songs which were not contained on TMD. I think they should have pressed more. I think 500 are being pressed for America.

BS: The message “sing while you may” appears on nearly all of your records. It seems fairly simple, but I gather it’s very important to you.

EK: It is very important. It’s to do with that Terminal Kaleidoscope idea. But taking it further, is there any more significant period in the history of the planet so far than now? When you look at things it’s exciting actually. Even if it’s disturbing in some ways, be glad you live now.

BS: At what age did you realize that you wanted to be a musician?

EK: In a way, I always did, even when I was a little kid. It’s just something that was part of me. I come from a very unmusical family really. No musicians at all really. I was 17 when I first tried making music. It was ok. It was naive but it was a start. Everybody has to start somewhere.

BS: How many albums do the Pink Dots have total, including casette only releases?

EK: I couldn’t say, I have no clue. I know there’s 13 albums including the Pink Box. That doesn’t include solo records, which I think is another seven, casette-only releases, Tear Garden and other projects.

BS: Of course my next question is, how do you find time to write and record all of this diverse material?

Ek: I think it’s a natural thing. When you’re really into it, and you’re working 356 days a year on it, maybe 40 or 50 songs a year is not so many. We don’t really take days off, because we enjoy it so much. If you really enjoy things that much, you want more and more of it. It’s a creative addiction. It’s the same throughout the band, we can’t stop.

BS: Have you completed the album you were working on with Nurse With Wound’s Stephen Stapleton?

EK: We started work on it back in November. We’ve got to get together again. Steve lives in the west of Ireland. I plan to go to Ireland for a little while and then Steve will come to Holland. We’re also going to do a little recording together in New York. It will come together when it’s finished. It’s like everything, we never release anything until we think
it’s absolutely finished. It’s silly to rush anything. It will be different. As strange as spiders’ kneecaps. A strangeness you can’t relate to any other strangeness.

I think Steve’s one of the most talented, inventive people on this planet. I mean, why aren’t people talking about Steve Stapleton? Some people are looked upon as pioneers, great experimentalists, and you listen to it and think “Oh, God.”

BS: When will the next Teargarden LP be available?

EK: The whole recording will take place in August. We’re starting from scratch with no preconceived ideas about it at all, which is a nice way to enter an album. You can be totally open-minded. I’m holding myself back from preparing some lyrics, because I want to write them at the time. It just means I have to bite my fingers, sometimes.

BS: How did you get involved with cEVIN Key?

EK: He was writing to me for years, before Skinny Puppy even started. He liked the LPDs and wanted some of the early casettes and things like that. Then I was invited to Vancouver for some solo shows, and then Skinny Puppy
were in existence. We basically got together in the studio because it seemed such a logical move. We found that we got along really great and the friendship lasted right ’til now and continues. He’s a very creative guy himself.

BS: Are you still going to release a book with all of your lyrics and poetry?

EK: That’s still pending. I think it will take a while yet. I have to get together on it with Elke. Sometimes it gets put on ice for a couple of months. I want it to be good. I don’t think I’ll ever fit all of the lyrics in there. It’d be like a Bible or something. I don’t think anyone needs another Bible.

BS: Rumour has it that you have one of the most impressive record collections on this planet.

EK: That’s not true really. It’s been blown all out of proportion, I have 1000 records. It’s actually quite small compared to a lot of people. It’s an extremely esoteric collection. I’d say three-fourth’s of it you won’t find in your local record stores. I love the music, I just love the sounds these guys make.

BS: What’s your all-time favorite record?

EK: That’s a hard one… Cottonwood Hill by Brainticket. That might be my favorite.

BS: Do you have any plans to release another solo album anytime soon?

EK: Oh yeah, there’s one coming out in a month or two. Tanith and the Lion Tree. It’s all me. Some parts of it are very harsh, some parts are very beautiful, and it throws you from the harshness to the beauty in very short spaces of time. I love it now. There was a period of time where I wasn’t sure if it worked, but I’m convinced it works now. It’s a difficult album to digest. There’s a lot of information on the record in a way.

BS: Despite all of the apocalyptic visions on your album, there is also a very light side to your music. Are you generally a happy person?

EK: Yes, I am. Why should I be depressed? I don’t need to walk around feeling dejected all the time. In some ways, I am having the best time of my life these days. Though many of the depressing lyrics are written from recollections of moments of despair.

BS: It’s good to see that the Dots are still getting by despite Bob having recently been claimed by cancer.

EK: Not only did I lose a fellow Dot with Bob, I lost one of my best friends. Since it happened, my fears of death have freshly disappeared. I mean, I still feel his presence very strongly. Up on stage, it’s as though he is there with us still. You cannot kill the spirit.

BS: What is the ultimate goal of the LPDs?

EK: There is an obscure image of perfection. There may be moments when we feel we are close, but we’ve never quite reached it. I’m not really sure if it can be reached. In a way it would be sad if we reached it, because there would be no more need to continue with it. I’m not really worried though. I’m sure that we have a long way to go yet.

 

Spiral Scratch Magazine- Edward Ka-Spel

Interview in Spiral Scratch Magazine (a UK record collectors magazine) September 1991.

After some months of overcoming the difficulties of planning a virtual world tour, the Legendary Pink Dots finally landed in the UK to perform the fourth concert of nearly 7O across Europe and America, promoting the wonderful new album The Maria Dimension on Play It Again Sam Records. I caught up with Edward Ka-Spel, singer and Lyricist with the group, at the first of only two UK shows on the tour, the second being some time this June.

J Initially, when did you first get into making music, and were you a writer/poet before making music?

E: I was a poet who used to put his poems in a drawer for years and years, and it was in 1980 I kind of thought that, it was a time of Throbbing Gristle and people who couldn’t play were making music, but it still sounded great. I thought, well if those guys can do it, and they were encouraging other people to do it, I could do it too. Myself and Phil, our keyboard player, went to Stonehenge Free Festival and saw a little band playing at two o’clock in the morning at the end of a field. We were the only audience and that was probably the second that the Legendary Pink Dots were conceived. As soon as we got back from the festival, I bought a very cheap synthesizer on hire purchase, and an old drum machine and amplifier, and suddenly there was a band there. We were quite obsessive, right from the start, playing about 15 hours, improvising night after night. It was a time when many people were making cassettes, selling themselves, designing the covers themselves. This all really appealed to me, basically, that’s how we started.

J Why the name ‘The Legendary Pink Dots’?

E: It was to do with these mysterious blobs of pink nail varnish on the keys of the piano, and we were talking about those `legendary pink dots’, and nobody actually christened the band at any time – we were just stuck with it.

J That was the first band you were in?

E: Oh yeah

J Was it ‘industrial’ music, like Throbbing Gristle, that was the influence on the band’s sound initially ?

E No, not so much musically. It was quite ‘industrial’ but more like industrial…nursery rhymes! Very much our own kind of sound, we never wanted to sound particularly like anybody else. We just basically improvised all the time.

J So the first album was Brighter Now on In Phaze. Was In Phaze your own label?

E: Oh no, it was run by a guy called Pat Birmingham. Actually, we got dreadfully ripped off, right through the In Phaze years.

J So, how long was it between that and being picked up by Play It Again Sam, as they are now re-releasing all the old material?

E: Well, there’s been four labels, in fact. We went from In Phaze to this little Dutch label called Ding-Dong who absolutely murdered us as well. We quickly got out of that and went to another small label in Holland. and they weren’t so good, and then it was Play It Again Sam who actually signed us, although we’d already had two albums out on PIAS.

J In 1985, the band emigrated to Holland. What were the reasons behind the move and why choose Holland?

E: Well, it was the first country which acknowledged our music properly, you know. We’d just brought out The Tower in England, which was a really important album to me, because it was all about England. It was about a trend that I saw in England, like this growing fascism type of thing – it was a real scream against it, and it was ignored! Apart from David Tibet, who did a review in Sounds, but even that was six months after the album came out. I just thought, well, ‘Damn You, but it was praised in countries like Holland and Germany and countries like that. Holland seemed a good country to live, and l had a girlfriend at the time who was Dutch so there were all sorts of reasons to go. It also forced me to try to make a living out of music without any kind of jobs.

J Is this something you’ve achieved now?

E: Yeah, it’s very important.

J What is the significance of the sub-title ‘China Doll’ that appears on so many tapes and records?

E: In a way, I think it outlasted it’s welcome (laughs). It’s just basically to do with a mental state, you know. I touch you and you start to dance, push you and you fall to pieces, I lived that sort of, life, really. They are very personal songs, especially on things like Laugh China Doll. A very, very personal album. I’m still extremely fond of that record, though it’s extremely primitive, it was done in four days, you know. I’ve dropped the China Doll’ prefix on solo albums, the next one won’t be called ‘China doll’.

J is this the one with Steve Stapleton of Nurse With Wound?

E No, that’s another one (laughs). There’s a solo album coming out in a month, with Third Mind Records, Tanith And the Lion Tree, which is alone. I’m working on one with Steve Stapleton, during the course of the year, working on the third Tear Garden LP in August

J What is it like working with Skinny Puppy? Their use of electronics is a lot more extreme, directed towards hard, dance music. Is it difficult working with people whose ideas may be such a contrast?

E: No, because there is a great deal of respect going on and a great deal friendship as well with Cevin for many years. Cevin was into the Pink Dots before Skinny Puppy existed, that’s how the whole thing happened. I just played some solo shows in Vancouver and he came to see them, and just said, ‘We should go into the studio together”. That’s how it worked out, and we liked it so much, we want to carry it on whenever it is possible. It’s very open. We work well.

J How do you feel about The Maria Dimension as a part of the Ka-Spel career?

E. I’m totally proud of it. I’m not wild about every-thing we’ve done, and we’ve done an awful lot in our time. There are things I can look back on and think ‘that was a mistake, maybe’. But the last two albums, I’ve really felt very close to and I think Crushed Velvet Apocalypse was aiming for what we’ve achieved on Maria Dimension, very swirling, very colourful. It has an atmosphere that drags you in and drowns you, in a way.

J What other Music and Art inspires you?

E: Other bands – I like a lot of the German psychedelics, like Brainticket, and groups like that. I like a lot of avant garde music, musique concrete, not from an intellectual point of view, I just enjoy the sounds that are used and the textures that are employed.

J What about writers?

E I don’t really read so much, I’m so busy all the time (laughs). My favourite author is, probably, Harlan Ellison, an American sci-fi writer, well, it’s not really sci-fi, more psychological. Robert Sheckley I also enjoy.

J. What is the point of the imagery of The Maria Dimension, the Madonna with child in those snowflake things… ?

E: That was a dream, actually We were looking for a title for the album. We knew it had a certain feeling to it, but we couldn’t t think of a title at all and I was in Greece with Elke my girlfriend and I had this dream of Six Virgin Mary’s waving and smiling, inside these like, soap machines. I woke up and “This has to be the cover of the album!!” “Sounds great, but what do you call that scene?” – well, it’s the… “The Maria Dimension” (laughs). A dimension where Virgin Mary’s smiles and waves from soap machines…

 


 THE PHILOSOPHY

“So it goes, we stand alone by standing stones, and we turn them into circles… ‘

Since the dawn of time, we’ve looked for answers, and merely unearthed a myriad of questions. Circles within circles. The root of our insanity, on a global scale, in our daily shuffle around the supermarket. The answers simply aren’t there – we re all pawns in a game that we don’t understand the rules of. Hyekk! And now time accelerates and the insanity grows and the millennium approaches and the whisper is ‘apocalypse’. Fact is, the world is as likely to end by turning into a cornflakes as it is by war or ecological disaster. How arrogant of the human race to think it could honestly bite the hand that feeds it. Isn’t it better to embrace the game, enjoy this time of change? Sing while you may

These are exciting times for us all – maybe it is the most exciting time in the whole history of the planet. Legendary Pink Dots are offering a soundtrack of this process. We do it in our own peculiar way – and respect others who are also playing their part. But if anyone is really looking for THE ANSWER, we suggest they look inside themselves and start exploring those circles. It’s a fascinating practice.

Edward Ka-Spel, Nijmegen.

 

The Editrice- Love And Loud Colours

KJN & Edward Ka-Spel | Boyd Memorial Park, San Rafael, 2 August 1991

 

EDWARD KA-SPEL: Did you like the show last night?

KIRSTEN JANENE-NELSON: Oh yeah, oh definitely — I’ve never seen you before, so I was pretty … overwhelmed, in a sense, because I feel I know the music relatively well, and I’m interested in literature, so the lyrics and the poetry is what I really focus on — But the whole — it was so big; I mean, not the place, but — the whole stage is this big, bursting cloud —

EK: Yeah …

KJN: — and it needs to get out, but it’s better confined — it makes it stronger when it’s confined. It was pretty amazing — I was very impressed.

KJN: I’ve heard at least three answers to how you chose the name Legendary Pink Dots, and I was wondering if you make up a story each time or if there is one real answer.

EK: There is one real answer, I was just becoming really annoyed about giving the same answer over and over again, so we made up some really ridiculous things like diseases and spots growing on Phil’s face in the shape of King Arthur. [laughs] It was basically this old piano we had in the squat where we began — it just had blotches of pink nail varnish on the keys. I mean, the piano came from about 1908 or something, and we were curious about why were they there — because if you press them all together it’s just a very odd discord — a very pleasing one. And we wondered if those blotches of pink nail varnish went back to 1908, so they quickly became known as “those legendary pink dots.” And because we had such a boring name right at the beginning [laughs] — we were called One Day for about a month, so that name tended to creep into our consciousness.

KJN: That’s one of the versions I heard, actually.

EK: That is the true one.

KJN: One person said it was a philosophy of the history of time, or something, and someone else said it was a type of acid.

EK: Apparently it was a type of acid — but I didn’t personally know about this until the band had been in existence for two-and-a-half years … when somebody came up and said: “Have you got any?!” Any what? “Legendary pink dots.” Huh? And then he explained. [laughs] A really peculiar coincidence. 

KJN: You said you were called One Day before — were you in any groups before the Legendary Pink Dots?

EK: No, that was the first, really.

KJN: How did you get the whole thing started?

EK: Just three friends. Went to a free festival together — we watched a band improvising at the end of a field at one o’clock in the morning, and we were the audience. And they had a full light show and they were just totally into what they were doing — and that was the moment when we decided: Why aren’t we doing that? It doesn’t matter if there’s three people who get into you — it’s just such fun to do. And we were looking no further than maybe three fans in the world, [laughs] at that point.

KJN: Had you had any musical training before that?

EK: No — no, none at all.

KJN: So you just decided to start it and then learned it along the way?

EK: Yeah, just someone showed me what an “A” was on the keyboard, and we took it from there. I’m not a very good keyboard player — the art is in the composition rather than in the playing. Niels is a fine musician, I think, on the saxophones, and Martijn is a good guitar player. Me and Phil, yeah, we’re … quite philistines when it comes to actual technique. [laughing]

KJN: You’ve written so much — did you realize that you had such creativity before you started? Did you do other things?

EK: I wrote lyrics for a long time. I’d usually just put them away in a cupboard or a drawer. Seemed a shame, but at a certain point you wonder who’s actually interested.

KJN: So then did you go back and use a lot of those lyrics?

EK: Yeah, some things. Only at the start. [pause] Would you like a cigarette?

KJN: No, thank you.

I’m interested in the fact that you are released on several different labels — that’s not something I’m aware of most other bands doing. Why and how do you work that?

EK: With extreme difficulty, really. I mean, we’re really signed to Play It Again Sam [PIAS] — in Belgium. It’s a good label; they treat us very fairly. But we’re also very much an underground band in principle and spirit — and everything like that — which means that if somebody came up to us and said, “Hey guys, I really want to make a single which is an edition of 300 copies, with day-glo covers and [laughs] flowers growing out of it — Would you be interested?” And we would say, Yeah! Great idea! [laughs] Because we can’t resist things like that — and so we do quite a few of these things. [laughs] But it is only the band that is signed to PIAS; as a solo artist I remain completely free — that was the deal I had with PIAS. Because I need the solo career as well — it’s the one thing where I can have complete control over everything — there’s just a side of me that needs that — and with the Pink Dots I like it to be everybody, a pool of ideas — I need that too. And the solo thing was never tied up by a record company — only for two years — and that was like a prison.

KJN: What is D’archangel?

EK: That was a name that seemed to be riddled with bad luck. [laughs] It was what I called myself for a while, when I worked with someone else. There were a few shows under that name, all of which were complete disasters — so I thought: “No more D’archangel — it’s cursed, that name.” So I just went back to plain old Edward Ka-Spel from then on.

KJN: I would say that you have different approaches in writing Pink Dot songs versus solo work. Do you agree?

EK: Yeah, there is a difference, I think, in the solo albums — especially when you take something like Khataclimici China Doll — the solo albums are gradually winding their way further and further out — and the next one [Tanith and the Lion Tree] goes even further out. They’re always pushing barriers, the solo albums. Pink Dots do push barriers, but usually they move at a slightly slower rate. Some solo albums I think can completely alienate some people. Take “Der Khataclimici,” for instance — I know people to this day who just cannot stand that track. [laughs] It’s one of those things where it was an experiment I remain proud of.

KJN: About the fact that you are so prolific, that you’ve written so much — basically, How do you do it?

EK: You see, I don’t think we’re that prolific, really. I mean, if you’re really committed to something, if you really believe in it passionately and you enjoy doing it so much — maybe forty or fifty songs a year is not so many.

KJN: Do you have an idea of how many songs you’ve written?

EK: No clue, I don’t keep count — I’ve never been any good at filing systems. [laughs]

Note: By the year 2000, when the band had been in existence for twenty years, Edward’s lyric total for the Pink Dots, The Tear Garden, and solo albums exceeded 500 songs.

KJN: Do you write all the time?

EK: Yeah. Yeah, I’m always busy with ideas.

KJN: So is it on a daily basis — you get an idea and write it down — or do you go through periods of time —

EK: Lyrics come in bursts. Sometimes I will not write a lyric for a month or two, and then on one day I will write maybe four sets of lyrics — and that will carry on, it will gain a momentum over a few days, and suddenly I’m finding that I’ve got a deluge of lyrics there. Music comes … yeah, pretty constantly. I’m always dreaming a track —

KJN: How do you keep track of everything — I mean, do you just get an idea and then run and write it down or record it?

EK: Yeah, there are probably as many lost ideas as there are [laughing] recorded ideas.

KJN: Do you think maybe the lost ones come around again or are they lost forever?

EK: Sometimes they’re lost forever. I have a horrible habit of writing lyrics down on the back of envelopes — and then I lose the envelopes. [laughs and sighs]

KJN: You’ve released albums as well as older cassette releases. How many cassette recordings do you have?

EK: Cassette releases there’s been masses of — pretty much as many as albums. [About thirteen at the time of this interview.] And they’re completely just cassette releases — which are like albums in themselves — with different material from the albums.

KJN: So how can fans keep up with all that?

EK: With extreme difficulty, I think.

Note: The Pink Dots have to date rereleased selections from their cassette releases on CD, including: Basilisk, Stained Glass Soma Fountains, and Under Triple Moons.

KJN: Is the catalogue in the Legendary Pink Box complete?

EK: No, very much abridged.

KJN: Is it possible to obtain a complete one?

EK: Yeah — friends of ours, actually, helped us out — because they said, “Well, you’re never going to do it, so we’re going to do it for you; we’re going to make up a Discography Booklet” — I mean it is literally a sixteen-page booklet — and they printed it up and they kept it up to date — and we just give it away in the mail. [pause] Yeah, it was great for us — I mean there were things in there that I’d forgotten about. [laughs] I don’t have our complete discography — I mean I don’t have a complete set of Pink Dots tapes, for instance, back home, ’cause some are lost — and some compilations the guys never even sent a copy … that’s really bad.

 Note: a current discography is available at legendarypinkdots.org

KJN: How many compilations are you on?

EK: I don’t know.

KJN: Somebody was joking that it seemed you were on every one you could find.

EK: In the early days there was some truth to that — now it’s very rare.

KJN: Is that just an approach to get your music spread as far as possible?

EK: Not really — it’s that somebody will come up with an idea for a compilation and I thought: Oh, this is a nice idea, and we just do something for it. But we were burned too many times on the compilations. You get an opportunist who wanted to put out a compilation and get the Pink Dots track on it so it would sell reasonably well and then not send you a copy. We only ever asked for maybe six copies of the record, just as payment for it. And they couldn’t even come up with one. And so now we’ve got to know that person really well before we do it.

KJN: So you’re saying that the songs on compilations are created for each compilation itself?

EK: Usually, yeah — that’s how we prefer to do it. Sometimes … PIAS released a compilation called Generate, and they just simply took a truncated version of “Blacklist” without telling us — we didn’t like that so much — and Nettwerk did the same with a Tear Garden track, “Ophelia.” I mean, I much prefer to give something that is for that compilation, and not just something that’s lifted from a record — that’s band policy. I mean, with the 12″ EPs that we’ve released — we never wanted them to come off the album. So they’re always separate, with three different tracks that were not on the album. They’re only combined on the CD version. So when people buy a 12″ and suddenly they find that the three tracks on the 12″ are on the album that they bought — I mean, that’s not fair.

Note: Many tracks that previously appeared on compilations have been rereleased on various Chemical Playschool CDs.

 

KJN: Tell me about the Chemical Playschool cassettes.

EK: Well the first one, One & Two, that was recorded after we were in existence a year, and it was meant to document that first year of existence. We made 25 copies — they all went to America with a distributor called Eurock, who really helped us in the early days. And, um, then we accidentally jammed over the [laughing] master tape, and it was lost for about six or seven years — even we didn’t have a copy. Then someone tracked one down — and sent us a copy of it — so we were able to rerelease it and it was like: Aaahh! Finally we can hear it again! [laughs]

Three & Four was a real … yeah, it was an extremely ambitious and altruistic thing — in that we would make 83 copies of Chemical Playschool Three & Four, this three-hour-long extravaganza — which were each hand-equalized as well as run off — every copy was listened to and equalized — and each with handmade covers. And we’d sell them for £5 each, which was literally the price it cost to make them. What we forgot about was the postage — and so [laughing] for every tape we sold we lost a pound on. And people were saying, “Aagh, you bastards … Why 83 copies? Aagh, it’s terrible! Aagh, no …” So we took it up to 120, still losing a pound [laughing] each time we made one — and then we thought: We’ve got to stop it! [laughing] We’re losing a fortune on this! We never thought of increasing the price …  And ultimately we rereleased it and made it a price where we actually made a little bit from it rather than lost every time. [pause] It still goes — it’s like an old war horse. The best cassette release was Chemical Playschool Three & Four.

KJN: How often do you listen to your old things?

EK: Not so much — it comes in bursts. Usually when we’re about to record something, it’s nice to refer back to what you’ve done. I mean, there’s certain albums I’m very, very proud of in Pink Dots — Curse I’m very proud of — and The Tower — and Asylum. Any Day Now. And the last two [Crushed Velvet Apocalypse and The Maria Dimension]. But there’s some I have trouble with as well — Island of Jewels I find a very disjointed album. Take any track individually I think it’s okay — but taken as a whole, I think it’s a bit of a mess …  You learn it in retrospect — and I believe you should always learned from your mistakes as well.

KJN: Where are you from, originally?

EK: East London — Dagenham. We were a completely English band until 1988 when four people left the band — and then we converted to half-English, half-Dutch. I mean, it was because we were living in Holland that the four people left the band, I think, really. They missed England — they were sick of wondering where the next meal would come from, which I suppose I understand, in a way.

KJN: Why did you move?

EK: A lot of reasons, really. I had a Dutch girlfriend at the time. We were ignored in England — greatly. Holland was the first country to actually embrace the band. It was an adventure, and it was the make-or-break: I want to live off of creating — I don’t want to support the band just through doing a normal job — which I always had trouble with and rarely lasted very long in any one job. And that was the test — I move; there’s no way I can get a job in Amsterdam, because I can’t speak the language — so it forced me to step over a hurdle.

KJN: Are you funded by the country?

EK: No, not at all. There’s a lot of bad blood over there — they don’t even accept us as a Dutch band. They won’t give us any support whatsoever.

KJN: So why is it that you stay … I mean, you can survive on the band?

EK: We survive on the band, now, yeah. For the last two or three years.

KJN: Only just that?

EK: Yeah. I mean, before that we were surviving, but [laughing] it was another kind of survival. We were going without food and things like that to make it work. It was quite a scary time. But gradually you always saw it improving, that was the thing, and that always gave you the hope to just push on.

KJN: What’s the music scene like in Amsterdam?

EK: A wasteland. An absolute wasteland. It’s better in the town that I live in now — which is a small town called Nijmegen. And there’s a little Nijmegen underground scene, which is nice. I mean, for a town of 100,000 people there must be 200 or 300 bands — it’s crazy. But most of them are just rock bands. But it’s okay there — I like it — I’ve made some good friends there.

KJN: How long have you lived there?

EK: Nijmegen — 1988 — there two-and-a-half years …  Yeah, I was in Amsterdam before that, solidly, but then they knocked down the house we were living in. It was a squatted house — no rights. [laughs]

KJN: How would you say your music’s evolved?

EK: It’s difficult to say because the intentions behind it have always been exactly the same — which is just the intention to explore, and explore in an emotional way rather than in a clinical way. [pause] I think we’ve simply become better players — we can command … yeah, we can pin down the actual playing side far better than in, say, 1980. That way it’s evolved, because I think greater technique does offer greater freedom. But, spiritually, I’d say we’re exactly the same as on the first day. 

KJN: How would you say your lyrics have evolved?

EK: Again, it’s really hard to say. Maybe … I’m better at expressing myself. I was a very, extremely shy and lonely person who had terrible trouble expressing himself at all before the Pink Dots. And the Pink Dots has forced me and taught me to relate to people.

KJN: I heard an interview from 1987 in New York where you said, regarding the stream-of-consciousness approach to your writing, that you just wrote what you thought and left it at that — didn’t go back and change it —

EK: Yeah, basically that’s still the same. Sometimes I’ll cross out a word here or there or swap it with something else — but the lines remain in their place. And sometimes I may take a wrong alleyway, and I’m going down this alleyway and I’m realizing actually this is an alleyway that’s going nowhere. [laughs] And so then I’ll just take a different alleyway … But it will always be stream-of-consciousness.

KJN: Concerning the self-confessional side to your lyrics, do you ever regret having exposed certain parts of yourself?

EK: Sometimes … well, I mean The Lovers was a bit like that in that it was a relationship that simply didn’t work out — and I’d virtually declared it to the whole world. And I’ve lived to regret that here and there …  I mean, I was in love for the first time in my life — and I’d told everybody — and some people won’t forgive you for that, if it goes wrong. Some people judge you. And I think it’s unfair to judge, ’cause I’m only human. It’s as if everybody else can change their partners like hell — but I can’t, because I’ve done that. To some people …  And there are many reasons why things did go wrong.

KJN: I was thinking of “Obsession,” songs like that — I mean, I myself have written some things where later I regretted that anybody else read it. So I think that’s wonderful — to be able to say what one is thinking and just get it out without worrying so much about what other people think —

EK: Yeah, you have to get it out, I agree. It does the soul the power of good.

KJN: What is it like performing things? From the show last night I would say you kept your most personal ones out. Do you perform the more personal songs?

EK: Well sometimes, yeah …  I mean, “Even Now” we were performing regularly — which is absolutely raping the soul, a song like that. And “Love Puppets” we performed for two, three years. But I don’t ever want a song to become tired — we tend to change things around quite a lot. I mean, tonight we will play certainly a different kind of set from last night — ’cause it’s fun to change things around.

KJN: You didn’t play a few that I was hoping to hear.

EK: What were you hoping to hear?

KJN: Well, definitely “Just a Lifetime.”

EK: Well, no, we overplayed it last year — we did it for two years in a row.

KJN: Except you didn’t come here …

EK: Yeah … you see, you miss all the Europe tours.

KJN: And “I Love You in Your Tragic Beauty” I really, really wanted to hear.

EK: That’s hard, because — I don’t know if you heard about our tragedy this year. Bob, our guitar player, died — who played the acoustic guitar, who played the sitar — he died of cancer in March 1991. And, it was … yeah, it’s a long story. We were on the road as it happened — we were in a position where we had to tour — and Martijn stepped in the band a weEK before we went on tour, with Bob giving us lots of advice: “Look, this is the situation, this is how I am. Don’t tell Martijn what he has to do, don’t tell him he has to play like me,” which made it even more heartbreaking … So we toured Europe under a terrible cloud. Now Bob’s wife is with us, she’s managing the group now. ’Cause it was his biggest wish to go to America. And the first time when we came, his visa alone was denied. The second year, all our visas were denied. And the third year he didn’t make it. So we’re playing a lot for him.

KJN: That’s ironic, given the song itself — “tragic beauty.”

KJN: If you had to describe your music, what would you say?

EK: Yeah, I’ve never liked to do that, actually.

KJN: What if someone asked who had never heard your music and had no idea —

EK: Well, I usually say: Imagine the most emotional and psychedelic music you’ve ever heard — sort of how you wanted psychedelia maybe to sound like, but never quite did.

KJN: Hmm … yeah, I see it as colorful — kind of shining colorful — like your album covers. By the way, who designs your album covers?

EK: Oh, this guy from Brussels. He was the house artist for PIAS, but he really connected very well with us — I like his work — and he likes the music. It’s a good combination, I think.

KJN: It’s wonderful to be able to create a visual representation of a sound — to actually capture that.

EK: Yeah, I think he’s very talented.

KJN: Do you do other forms of art?

EK: Me, no no. Two left hands as far as painting is concerned — I wish I could, but I really can’t.

KJN: Have you ever tried?

EK: Oh, my girlfriend’s always nagging me about that — she says, “You can do it if you want to,” but I know I can’t.

KJN: Not even photography, or video, or —

EK: Collâge — I like making collâges. I did a couple of the cassette covers off the Chemical Playschools and things like that, but I would not say that I’m good at it — I just have a lot of fun doing it.

 

KJN: Where would you say you’re hoping to take your music in the upcoming years?

EK: Hmm … I’ve no idea …

KJN: It just sort of happens?

EK: It just sort of happens … As long as the hairs on my spine keep tingling, then I’m happy. If they cease to tingle at some time, then I’ll stop. 

KJN: In terms of predicting trends, where do you think the state of music will go in the future?

EK: It seems to have diversified greatly recently — I mean you’ve got the new psychedelic bands, which aren’t really psychedelic at all — and you’ve got your heavy, rhythmic dance bands — I must say they all tend to sound the same. [laughs] There’s a few exceptions, I think — I mean, there are other bands that I think are wonderful, have kept their credibility — like Coil, and, I must say, Skinny Puppy — I don’t class them in that sort of big-beat thing because there’s pain in that music. It’s real emotions going on, it’s not an image that’s being put up front. There will always be bands that will retain their own character — there always have been. It’s just that some of them tend to get shoved under the carpet, as the bigger record companies try and formulize everything — but they never ever succeed and that’s the great hope.

At this point in the interview two little girls who had been in the playground nearby passed us on the steps we perched on, uttering “Excuse me,” and “Run, Sheila! Cover up your tracks!”

KJN: You mentioned “psychedelic” as a description of your music. What influence do drugs have on the band?

EK: Actually, very, very little when it comes down to it. I went through a period when I wanted to try everything once — but by “everything” I exclude the hard drugs — I never wanted to touch those. Basically I had to sample everything, really — some things I liked, some things I didn’t. But I do not indulge in drugs very much at all — not for the last three years. I’d just break down if I did that — my body can’t take it.

KJN: That’s interesting, because in terms of the way you create and the types of creations you’ve made — it seems to me that it would take a very intense mindset, which I would think most people are not capable of. So that says a lot if, without the help of drugs, your creations can be so intense.

EK: No, I certainly can’t write lyrics or make music under the influence of drugs at all.

KJN: Do you think it influences you in terms of when you do turn to write?

EK: The experiences I had — I mean, I’ve only ever taken acid twice in my life, contrary to rumors. The first time was a really interesting time, the result of which was “You and Me and Rainbows” with The Tear Garden — a piece I stand behind so much. But I never had the feeling like: I have to taste it again, straight away. It was always: That was a curious experience — maybe I’ll try it again, experience it again, in maybe a year. That’s as far as it goes. It’s not something I need, really. I suppose the things I saw and the things I felt played a part in some creations — but certainly not generally.

KJN: How did The Tear Garden get started?

EK: Cevin was a Dots fan. Before Skinny Puppy actually existed he sent me a letter with a photograph of all the Pink Dots cassettes and records that he had. From the letter I thought: This is a nice guy, we’ll get in touch with each other. And I was invited to Vancouver for four solo shows — by then Skinny Puppy was existing, about the time of Bites — and we met, we immediately got on, and it seemed logical that we should go into the studio together. And doing that made us want to do it more, because it really worked in an excellent way. And we’ve just remained really good friends, for years — and we’re doing another one now, when the tour finishes. Both of us are totally looking forward to it.

KJN: So there will be future releases?

EK: Yeah, I think the next one [The Last Man to Fly] will come out in December, as we record it in August … oh, it is August … we start recording it in a weEK! [laughs]

KJN: I understand you have connections with Death in June and Current 93.

EK: Death in June I don’t know so well. But Current 93, yeah. David Tibet’s an old friend … a dear old friend.

KJN: Have you done projects together?

EK: Actually, no. Steve Stapleton I’ve worked with — he’s one of my oldest friends … he’s Nurse With Wound. But each of those three bands is actually very different, even if they share members sometimes.

KJN: What about the MIMIR project?

EK: That’s another thing that I’d love to continue because again it’s a thing of friendship. It’s logical that we should make something with HNAS because we’ve liked each other’s music for a long time — and we visit each other all the time. He doesn’t live so far away, Christoph — HNAS — and we often get together.

KJN: What are some of your influences in terms of musical or literary or artistic in any way?

EK: Literary I’d say none — I actually very rarely read because I’m so busy working all the time. Musically I think a lot has tended to maybe creep in there — because I use to love the old German bands, first of all — that’s the first music I listened to, like Faust and Can. Because they always just went so far — and … yeah, you don’t need drugs when you listen to some of that, [laughing] because you’re floating off there, a big smile on your face. I mean, as far as their being influences, I just wish that the Pink Dots had the same effect on others as those bands have on me.

KJN: Well, I think your effect is a strongly positive one — sometimes mesmerizing, I would say — I mean, personally. So, I think you’re succeeding …

KJN: Do you sense that you influence others?

EK: Here and there, yeah.

KJN: Do you hear yourself in others’ music?

EK: Oh, quite a lot has cropped up — often in a lot of new bands, a lot of contemporary bands — I’ve noticed things here and there. I’m quite complimented by it … Though, I heard one band that got an extreme amount of praise heaped on them and grew far bigger than the Pink Dots quite suddenly, and I could have sworn that they’d been listening to The Tower, endlessly. And that’s a bit shocking when that happens — when you’re being ignored and another band that seems to have lifted whole reams of ideas from you is being elevated. But, I mean, that’s not the band’s fault, really, that’s the media’s fault.

KJN: Plus, I would say your approach is much more about musical integrity — I see you as closer to your audience than a lot of bands, who get separated from their fans by the nature of the music business.

EK: Absolutely. We don’t seEK out the media.

KJN: In your writing I’ve noticed various moods — from strikingly intense to serenely calm. Do you go through different stages on a regular basis or do you go through longer periods of time when you feel softer about things or more painful about things?

EK: It tends to go up and down like a yo-yo. [laughs]

KJN: On a daily basis?

EK: Maybe not on a daily basis — but I have periods like that where it seems to be on a daily basis …  Yeah, I tend to be a happier person than I was years ago — a calmer person.

KJN: What would you attribute to that?

EK: The Dots itself — I’m very pleased with it. My home life is nicely settled now — I’ve got a lovely girlfriend [Elke Skelter] of several years who comes with me on the tours and … it feels good. Yeah, things like that — they’re pieces in your life that you need. There are still the down periods as well, of course, but then everybody has those.

KJN: I have a difficult-to-phrase question regarding different intentions I’ve noticed in your songwriting. In your lyrics I see all-encompassing themes as well as more specific or personal expressions. And within the music there is a contrast as well, of more electronic and modern musical styles on one hand and more classical instruments and styles on the other. So ultimately you end up with diverse approaches joining together in a combination of extremes. Is this intentional? Do you see yourself as trying to encompass everything?

EK: We try and encompass everything — yes, that’s for sure. But the music itself is actually very unpremeditated. It’s just what feels good, or what you hear at the time before you record it.

KJN: It’s interesting that you say that, because even though I think in a lot of ways you do encompass a great deal, I wouldn’t necessarily think it was intentional —

EK: The world isn’t black and white. There are so many shades in between. And I’m not a person who ever wants to force his opinion on people. I’m allergic to people preaching to me or throwing slogans at me. I mean, yeah … some of these slogans might be absolutely correct — I mean, things like racism, for example. It is shit — absolutely, 100 percent. But you know that — you don’t need someone hurling at you, “Racism is shit!” You know? What does that achieve? It’s better to color it in, to almost empathize with the alien mentality — and then twist it. Because I think you make more of a point that way — and you might get the guys who think in these … foul ways … to actually think about themselves.

KJN: I know exactly what you mean — I’ve experienced that recently regarding feminism —

EK: Yeah, that’s what “The Death of Jack the Ripper” is all about.  That was written against a wave of … in the industrial bands I was noticing so much horrible sexism — the most violent and awful descriptions of abuse of women. And I thought: Right, I hate this, but I’m going to have fun with it. The women are going to get their own back in this song.

KJN: That’s so great. Thank you …

Concerning the use of subject form in your lyrics — I was wondering about how you sometimes use the personal pronouns “we” or “you” and “I” — I guess “You and Me and Rainbows” would be an example — versus “they” or “he,” as in a story about someone else. Is there a pattern for which one you use, or is that just how it comes out?

EK: That’s just how it comes out.

KJN: Are there some stories about a “he” where it’s really more personal, where it should be an “I” but you’ve projected onto someone else instead?

EK: Sometimes, yeah. “Lisa” is me, for instance. It’s a kind of alter-ego — a side of me that is very, well, kind of destructive, kind of innocent, and gets into the most ludicrous situations. But I changed the sex to protect the guilty.

KJN: I was thinking of the imagination in a lot of the lyrics — and the fantasies and stories. One friend told me they all seem to be little stories that never really seem to resolve themselves —

EK: Yeah, because that’s how things usually are —

KJN: But some of them kind of do — “Princess Coldheart” seems to. And some of them are so like children’s stories — even “The Collector” I think of as a children’s story, really. I guess the music contributes to that, being so colorful, so playful.

At this point we realized Edward needed to get back to the club for soundcheck, so we continued talking while walking to the car.

KJN: What about your dreams, or your nightmares? I noticed there are recurrent themes in your lyrics and I wondered if you have recurrent dreams.

EK: I have recurrent dreams, yeah. I have some very heavy dreams sometimes, even last night — that was the night when the bomb went off, last night in a dream, and it was horrible. Happily that doesn’t happen too often. Sometimes I have fantastic dreams — like sitting on a window ledge with nothing but a void beneath you, watching twin moons, and planets whizzing around them, and you’re aware that This Is Significant and you don’t know how and you’re a little bit scared and a little bit thrilled — but you don’t know why.

KJN: I’ve noticed you have a constant theme of isolation — specifically, I’d say, in “Hotel Blanc.” What’s behind that song?

EK: It’s very much a side of me — it’s very, very personal. This was how I certainly was maybe all the time before the Pink Dots began and it’s how I still am occasionally because you never quite lose it. It lives with you, it follows you around …  You’ll notice how many songs I write about parties and how I hate them. [laughs] I still feel that way — I can’t help it.

KJN: Tell me what you like about dolphins —

EK: Dolphins? I think they’re some of the most beautiful creatures … to exist. I mean, that was about: What does it take to be perfect — what is the most perfect thing that you can think of. And it was between the dolphin and the tree, [laughs] ’cause I like trees too.

KJN: In a previous interview you said statues —

EK: Statues? Yeah, but there’s irony in statues. You see statues are humanmade creations — they’re the human beings that could never be. I don’t really think statues are perfect, partly because they are humanmade.

KJN: — because I read that you previously said statues are perfect and beautiful and can do no wrong —

EK: Yeah, they’re innocent, as well —

 

KJN: One last question in closing — What do you mean by “sing while you may?”

EK: “Sing while you may” is basically my optimism in action. This is a very special time for the planet. We’re witnessing things speed up incredibly, rapidly. I mean, it can be that we are literally on the verge of the end of the world as we know it — I doubt that, if I’m honest. What I do know is this is an extremely exciting and sometimes scary period of time to live in, and I say enjoy it — cherish it — be glad you live now — sing while you may. It may not be for very long, but then again it may be for ages. [laughs]

 

Source: http://www.the-editrice.com/loveandloudcolours/EdwardKaSpel-interview.html